
I knew the second I saw this come down my Tumblr dash that it was a total hoax.
The tone is just wrong.
But they got the awful design correct.
Isn't
People about ten years behind on that design overhaul we all deserve?
I'm so sick of looking at that cover when I have to wait in line somewhere.
It's so funny how sometimes you know something is wrong instantly but you can't even verbalize it.
I instantly knew that Lautner cover was "too
People to be
People."Last night, I was on a very well known blogger's site--he's embroiled in another one of those New York literary con-tro-ver-sies--fighting with the journalistic demons and dragons over something that should have never have even been a controversy.
I mean considering the banality of the literary bone of contention.
I don't say that to be mean. Lots of writers write deliberately banal works today. It's practically a literary movement, banality. Just another ironic school and strategy.
When people become famous other people attack them just to get attention. A quote from Mr. Obvious.
I think I used to do pathetic things like that because of my bipolar tendencies. And because I drank at the time.
But it's not the recent controversy that interested me.
What interested me is that none of these journalists were even arguing with
the person they thought they were.Either you know a writer's style and mannerisms or you don't.
I know enough of that author to say that
wasn't the guy.He had delegated that fight to someone else. Fucking funny.
And I think I even know which young fellow in his coterie received the assignment.
Because he's the best mimic in the group.
But. It's not. The same. Never is.
So the famous dude avoids stress in his life.
The only other possibility is that this "famous author" has drastically changed overnight.
That can happen with drugs or stress or mental illness, love woes, etc. Combinations of stressors.
But it was all wrong. The critical prose. The tone of brittleness was so atypical. Where before there was verve, an artful dodger, now there is a drop into the fray, the self-abasement of
contending.This author never contended heretofore. He floated above. Which was what made him a marvel and what ultimately made him famous.
Well that and a shitload of work.
Probably he is more his parents' child than he realizes.
Oh, probably he realizes.
Maybe he
is getting brittle. Maybe he is changing.
The only other evidence of something like that happening (the beautiful mask brittling and possibly beginning to crack) is a comment he made recently when an interviewer seemingly awoke the Anxiety of Influence while trying to get this young author agree to the importance of the mentorship of one of his college professors, a well-regarded writer in his own right. But a writer nowhere near as celebrated.
And the wunderkind could have been magnanimous but he instantly snapped back that he (and not his instructor) was the one who was responsible for choosing the class and placing himself in that environment.
I found it funny, protective reflexology. Maybe he is now in permanent defense mode. The young author then followed this up by stating that greater than ninety-eight percent of the publicity he has received through his career has been the result of the sweat of his own brow. Anyone who has followed this writer's career arc will know he's not exaggerating one bit. The intensity of the literary onslaught is pretty unprecedented--at least in my lifetime.
If he is changing under all the punches, that's really unfortunate, because he's too young to be that brittle and to stoop--even to slay dragons for the sake of chivalry.
It may just be noblesse oblige. He's always underscored the stupidity of human cruelty in his writings, creative or critical. So maybe he just figured once you become famous people become nicer to you and nicer to your friends. Maybe he thinks you eventually get a pass.
I want to doubt he was that naive.
Maybe he figures if he spews vitriol back, vitriol will stop. But that's so the opposite of everything that went before, and he surely knows that's using gasoline to quench fire. Maybe he likes big fires.
Of course, no publicity is bad publicity and he's lived his life along those Barnum lines, very funnily and very publicly.
That's something he rubbed in the faces of the ones attacking. How they were aggrandizing the subject of their attacks. He showed them how the story was radiating. He's very good at knowing how things radiate. That's the scientist in him. I saw he's now toying with trying to generate memes. So far his most successful meme is his literary style. And that's how it should be if you are achieving real success and not flash-in-the-pan success. It would be a fallacy to say you can gauge the success of a writer by how many imitators he or she has. Because I'm sure Jackie Collins has a lot of imitators. But I think it's fair to say you can gauge that
some type of success has been achieved when imitations begin to multiply. That's just the nature of the marketplace and literature is the marketplace (despite what purists want to think).
This is still quantitative success over qualitative success. If you believe the latter exists. I hope you do. But there's no chance you and I believe in the exact same thing when it comes to qualitative success. No chance in hell. Unless you lie. That's a good thing. That difference between all of us.
That's the mystery of extinction, really, what we're talking about when we start talking that direction.
Why wasn't T-Rex good enough to make the cut, but that shark was?They were both hungry monsters.
That's when you better start talking to flowers or Buddha or the Magic Lemur who knows all.
Because that is the Transcendental Shit of Bull in the Sky.
The odd thing is this author writes very well. And the author he felt compelled to defend is simply too young to write well. Maybe she will. Maybe he's as good at gauging potential in others as he is with himself.
Maybe he feels responsible for having published this author. If she turns around and suicides or something (by all accounts she was traumatized by this negative publicity and the attacks) of course her literary benefactor and protector is going to be fucked up by that. So he's probably doing the smart thing with all the damage control. By sparing himself future vicarious pain and possibly guilt.
I do feel vicariously abashed at what people are doing to her.
It must be progress on my part that I never enter these arguments anymore or ridiulously feel I have any stake in them. I now look at that insanity in my life and am finally able to be able to let it go as that, as insanity. You can't make sense of your own past insanity. You can only be grateful that you didn't physically or permanently damage anyone and hope your vile words, those plagues of locusts, were recognized as the ravings of a lunatic. That's how I look at them.
Even when I was totally fucked up I never attacked anyone I felt or knew was truly vulnerable. But that's why attacks are so fucking stupid. You never know how vulnerable anybody is, what shit they're dealing with. They're not going to come out and tell you.
One person I repeatedly got paranoid about (and that doesn't mean they weren't bedeviling me with parodies--it happens) I later found out lost her husband. To fucking murder. Instead of feeling like a piece of shit, I henceforth began to feel like a piece of shit
squared.I just cringe when I see my past self in these people now.
Those dysfunctional "literary" behaviors. The playground mentality.
I learned how important boundaries are for someone like me.
I used to not give myself any, and--much worse--I insanely felt nobody else should have them with regards to me. Well, in my fever pitch of mania I felt that way.
Probably the biggest misconception about bipolar mania is that it is a feeling of elation and superproductivity. It can be that. But it can also be paranoia, rage, and self-destructive behavior--and often this includes irrational attacks on people you care about very much in your non-manic periods. But of course one good mania can ruin a dozen friendships in a day. Trust me. I've done it.
But I didn't even know it was mania (and alcohol) warping my perspective. I thought it was reality making my life hell.
Instead of the truth: unreality was making my life hell.
I couldn't be further philosophically, emotionally,
mathe-fucking-matically, from that person than I feel now.
No. I'm not cured. And some people actually do get cured (a permanent one or one lasting many years) of bipolar disorder. It is one of the most treatable serious mental illnesses.
But I. Can't. Tolerate. The. Medicines.
So I have to try to use the cognitive strategies. I have to rely on self-discipline.
Once you remove alcohol, self-discipline becomes a much more realistic goal.
But I no longer look at people the way I once did. I try to give them the benefit of the doubt right up to the time they stab me in the neck.
I was recently "stabbed in the neck." But you know what? I'm glad it happened now rather than later. Because now I can manage my caring for that person in the appropriate way. I wish them well. But I'm not going to invest any more time in that direction.
I hope others do. The saints and those who have sangfroid to spare. I don't kid myself that I'll ever achieve the sort of self-possession where I have sangfroid to spare.
I will just get more and more careful with how I relate to other people.
Everyone's a hot potato. Everyone's trying to die correctly.
Or if they're not
keep well the hell away from them.I can't help anyone who is
another me and
other mes can't add anything of value to my life.
Cats are about as high as I care to go anymore on the scale of karmic interactions during the vast majority of my waking hours.
But I believe things will continue to get better, the way they have been getting better now for some time.
And maybe I will get better at--and more careful with--social interactions.
Well, until my body's failure or the loss or suffering of loved ones starts to chisel away at me, the usual horrors that happen to everyone. And I'll try to remember that then. That it happens to everyone. All the time. I'm not being singled out. That's a bipolar idea.
Even when you're well-behaved the universe is still gonna take you out. Piecemeal or all at once. I much prefer all at once. Dear Creator, please spare me having the semantics of suicide applied to my end, but please make it functionally as quick and efficient as those folks usually are with exiting (too early) the festival grounds.
Boom. Bitch goes down. I know a lot of people who die like that. And I always feel the universe loved them. That's so irrational it makes me giggle. That I think like that.
None of this means I don't want or need friends. I value friends more now.
But carefully chosen friends.
With whom I will try to be very careful myself.
I try to check every sentence now for how it was shaped by the bipolar filtration system in my brain.
But sentences still slip through and probably will for some time.
Sentences of overfamiliarity, sentences of lability, sentences of rage or dismissal.
But less and less.
Even criticizing human-made objects you're criticizing humans.
And I don't only mean in the artistic sphere.
No wonder so many rigorous thinkers end up looking like dismal Shakers.
Like stoic kooks.
They end up like the exact opposite of Yiddish.
Wittgenstein is the exact opposite of Yiddish.
Schopenauer is the exact opposite of Yiddish.
Exhausting people exhaust themselves.
Exceedingly careful people exhaust themselves.
The big sloppy emotions people blow through and they are most of life.
And they're exhausting too.
But their exhausting is on the outside.
Whereas the careful people's exhausting is on the inside.
Mostly.
Except the careful people are exhausting to the big sloppy emotions people and vice versa.
So life is designed to be an adventure in misunderstanding.
Probably quarks all hate each other.
That's a good place to stop.
The bottom.